Frederick, MD and EAA AVIATION CENTER, OSHKOSH, Wis. - The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) and the Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA) today jointly filed a request for an exemption with the Federal Aviation Administration that, if granted, stands to increase the level of safety and significantly reduce a substantial economic and regulatory burden for pilots who fly recreationally.
![]()
Currently, FAA regulation requires all pilots to hold at least a third-class medical certificate to exercise the privileges of a private or recreational certificate. AOPA and EAA are asking the FAA for an exemption to that rule which would give pilots who fly recreationally the option of getting a third class medical or instead, participating in a recurrent online education program that will teach them how to self-assess their fitness to fly.
The education program will cover aeromedical factors that exceed the training presently mandated by the FAA. Participating pilots would also be required to hold a valid driver's license and conduct a meaningful self-assessment prior to flight. The self-assessment required in the exemption will be similar to what pilots do now between AME visits. The difference is that pilots will have a higher level of knowledge to do the self-assessment after completion of the required education program.
The requested exemption would help to mitigate the increased risk inherent in transitioning to unfamiliar and sometimes distinctly different aircraft, which is the only currently available alternative to the FAA's third class medical.
![]()
This exemption request has been built upon substantial evidence obtained over the past 20 years, most recently proven through the successful medical safety standards allowed for under the sport pilot certificate, which currently utilizes the driver's license medical standard in lieu of an FAA medical certificate.
In the seven years since the sport pilot driver's license medical standard was established, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has not attributed a single accident in that category to medical deficiency. Interestingly, the majority of accidents involving aircraft eligible under sport pilot are classified by the NTSB as instructional or transition flights. The jury is in: the sport pilot medical requirement works. The AOPA/EAA exemption request builds on the positive safety data gathered in seven years of using driver's license medical certification with sport pilots, and reduces transition-related safety issues by primarily keeping pilots in familiar aircraft.
The AOPA/EAA-requested exemption would be allowed for use in the particular size of aircraft (single engine, 180 horsepower, fixed gear...) and types of operations (day, VMC, one passenger, not for-hire...) typically classified as recreational flight.
A 2009 AOPA policy survey found that 72% of the member respondents expressed a strong interest in eliminating the third class medical requirement for pilots flying recreationally. "Our petition offers substantial economic savings to pilots and the U.S. government," said AOPA President Craig Fuller. "A conservative estimate shows a savings of $241 million for pilots and $11 million to the federal government over 10 years."
"This initiative will preserve the freedom to fly by reducing a significant hurdle in the lives of many pilots and entrants into general aviation while maintaining or enhancing safety," said EAA President Rod Hightower. "It would also greatly increase the number of aircraft available for pilots flying strictly for recreation and encourage pilots to continue to fly in aircraft in which they are already familiar." - EAA, AOPA, FMI: AOPA Online and EAA FAQs
Currently, FAA regulation requires all pilots to hold at least a third-class medical certificate to exercise the privileges of a private or recreational certificate. AOPA and EAA are asking the FAA for an exemption to that rule which would give pilots who fly recreationally the option of getting a third class medical or instead, participating in a recurrent online education program that will teach them how to self-assess their fitness to fly.
The education program will cover aeromedical factors that exceed the training presently mandated by the FAA. Participating pilots would also be required to hold a valid driver's license and conduct a meaningful self-assessment prior to flight. The self-assessment required in the exemption will be similar to what pilots do now between AME visits. The difference is that pilots will have a higher level of knowledge to do the self-assessment after completion of the required education program.
The requested exemption would help to mitigate the increased risk inherent in transitioning to unfamiliar and sometimes distinctly different aircraft, which is the only currently available alternative to the FAA's third class medical.
This exemption request has been built upon substantial evidence obtained over the past 20 years, most recently proven through the successful medical safety standards allowed for under the sport pilot certificate, which currently utilizes the driver's license medical standard in lieu of an FAA medical certificate.
In the seven years since the sport pilot driver's license medical standard was established, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has not attributed a single accident in that category to medical deficiency. Interestingly, the majority of accidents involving aircraft eligible under sport pilot are classified by the NTSB as instructional or transition flights. The jury is in: the sport pilot medical requirement works. The AOPA/EAA exemption request builds on the positive safety data gathered in seven years of using driver's license medical certification with sport pilots, and reduces transition-related safety issues by primarily keeping pilots in familiar aircraft.
The AOPA/EAA-requested exemption would be allowed for use in the particular size of aircraft (single engine, 180 horsepower, fixed gear...) and types of operations (day, VMC, one passenger, not for-hire...) typically classified as recreational flight.
A 2009 AOPA policy survey found that 72% of the member respondents expressed a strong interest in eliminating the third class medical requirement for pilots flying recreationally. "Our petition offers substantial economic savings to pilots and the U.S. government," said AOPA President Craig Fuller. "A conservative estimate shows a savings of $241 million for pilots and $11 million to the federal government over 10 years."
"This initiative will preserve the freedom to fly by reducing a significant hurdle in the lives of many pilots and entrants into general aviation while maintaining or enhancing safety," said EAA President Rod Hightower. "It would also greatly increase the number of aircraft available for pilots flying strictly for recreation and encourage pilots to continue to fly in aircraft in which they are already familiar." - EAA, AOPA, FMI: AOPA Online and EAA FAQs